Nov. 5th, 2007

Reading

Nov. 5th, 2007 08:24 pm
sub_divided: cos it gets me through, hope you never stop (Default)
Daddy Long Legs by Jean Webster

Rescued from the "additional romance -- $1 each -- buy 4 get 1 free" section of the bookstore. (The only difference between "additional" and "regular" romance is that the regular romance is longer and costs $2.) Misleading summary aside, Daddy Long Legs is not romance, but it is charming and funny and militant and SHORT and I totally recommend it to everyone.

Plot: orphan girl is sent to an unnamed women's college in Connecticut (Smith?) courtesy of a mysterious benefactor; the only stipulation is that she write to him once a month. The book was written in 1912 (before women had the vote) and serves as a kind of object lesson in the ability of women (and orphans, and children) to think and reason independently. XD Not only does the narrator express radical opinions in her letters, she does it in a creative way (with pictures!) so that you can totally believe that she could have won a scholarship on the strength of her English composition.

Good book, short (I finished in a couple hours), recommended. It's a shame about the end though. ^^; Fun fact: Jean Webster did, in fact, grow up in an orphanage an orphan.

***

The News From Paraguay by Lily Tuck

Another book I want to recommend to everyone. XD Based strongly on the life of an actual person -- Ella Lynch, a beautiful Irish woman who leaves Paris and a Russian count (though actually he leaves her first) to be the mistress of Francisco Solano Lopez, future dictator of Paraguay. The story takes place in the mid-1800s and is told in short sections (including letters from Ella, omniscient asides, and close third-person perspectives from various characters) which add up to form the total picture. This book is HILARIOUSly dark and includes sections like the following:

Instead of babtism, to satisfy Ella, Franco commanded a 101-gun salute in honor of his son. The reverberations from the huns were so powerful that they caused several buildings under construction in Asunción to collapse; also one of the imported English field artillery rifles had not been cleaned properly and it backfired. The battery landed on the hospital and killed and injured a large number of the patients in their sickbeds.

I read that out loud to [livejournal.com profile] apintrix and she thought it sounded like magical realism, due to the matter-of-fact relating of a series of improbable events. The book does, actually, sound a little bit like Marquez (so the blurb on the back was right for once!), especially because the humor is all understatement. But at the same time, it's verrry different -- the magical realists, even when they're writing about massacres, still manage to sound hopeful, or at least there's the sense that through all of the horror they've managed to keep a sense of humor. This book is nearly the opposite: the light, frothing atmosphere suddenly turns dark; inoffensive characters are revealed as secret sadists; tragedies pile up.

But the narration stays light. XD Though I do think I like the earlier sections, where Tuck was more free to invent detail, more than the later sections, where I suspect she had more historical material to work into the narrative. Another thing to note about the book is that it uses Spanish as a literary device in the same way that I'm used to seeing French (or Latin -- but knowing French is normally way more useful for reading English literature). I've had to stop to look up phrases.

(Confession time: I also had to look Paraguay up on a map, when I began. ^^; I knew it and Uruguay were between Argentina and Brazil, but I couldn't remember which was the landlocked country and which was the one with Montevideo for a capital. (Answer: Paraguay's the one in the heart-of-the-jungle.) So on top of reading an entertaining book, I get to educate myself about 19th century Paraguay.)

***

Sorry for taking so long to answer this meme. I haven't given up! But I realized that my answers were getting shorter and shorter, and I didn't want to answer with just a "Character A" and no explanation, because that's boring to read. So I thought I'd take a break and finish...eventually. ^^;

P.S. November is Deathfic month at [livejournal.com profile] fanthology.
sub_divided: cos it gets me through, hope you never stop (Default)
Keith Olberman mentioned on Countdown tonight that while our soon-to-be-Attorney General and his detractors argue about whether or not there's enough public evidence in the present day to classify waterboarding as "torture," more than 100 years ago US soldiers were court-marshaled for using "the water torture" during the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars.

...I wrote that! In a letter a letter to Senator Kennedy on Friday. ^^; Well, I'm sure I wasn't the only one. In case you're curious, here are some excerpts from the testimony of Grover Flint during the Hearings into Affairs in the Philippine Islands (April-May 1902, 57th US Congress, 1st Session):

Read more... )

I used to have an electronic copy of this but I've lost it, sorry. The most telling thing is that during the entire examination, over and over again the Senators all refer to the water cure "or water torture" as torture straight-up, and are mainly concerned with whether it was effective or not and whether commissioned US officers oversaw the proceedings or not. The investigation into atrocities committed in the Philippines actually got a fair amount of press coverage during the summer or 1902; and then, apparently, it was forgotten. This (=Senate Doc. 331, Vol 3) was assigned reading for two classes.

And now back to frivolities.

March 2022

S M T W T F S
  12345
67 89101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

  • Style: (No Theme) for Transmogrified by Yvonne

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags